
Curtiss-Wright (CW) is shifting across the Russell family of indices, joining several growth-oriented benchmarks while exiting certain value and other indices, a reshuffle that can influence fund rebalancing and trading interest.
See our latest analysis for Curtiss-Wright.
Despite some recent volatility, with a 7 day share price return down 5.92% at around $737.39, Curtiss-Wright’s year to date share price return of 28.83% and 1 year total shareholder return of 51.17% point to momentum that has built over a longer stretch, supported by index reshuffling that may be reshaping how growth focused investors view the stock.
If the index move has you thinking about where else capital is flowing, it can be useful to widen the lens and scan for other infrastructure focused opportunities in power and grid technology through the 35 power grid technology and infrastructure stocks
With Curtiss-Wright now firmly grouped with growth stocks and trading around $737.39 after strong 1 year and multi year returns, the key question is whether you are seeing lingering undervaluation or a market that is already pricing in future growth.
The most followed Curtiss-Wright valuation narrative puts fair value at about $711, slightly below the last close of $737.39, which frames the stock as modestly ahead of that estimate while still anchored to detailed growth and profitability assumptions.
Record backlog growth (+12% YTD to $3.8b), strong book-to-bill ratios (1.2x in A&D), and a healthy order pipeline in both defense and nuclear align with management's confidence in posting 9 to 10% sales growth, 16 to 19% EPS growth, and over 100 bps of margin expansion in 2025, signaling undervaluation if current pricing underappreciates this forward visibility and operational leverage.
Want to see what is behind that fair value upgrade for Curtiss-Wright? The narrative blends multi year revenue growth, margin expansion and a richer earnings multiple, all filtered through a specific discount rate and buyback assumptions. Curious which variables do the heavy lifting in that model and how close they sit to the current price? Curious how numbers become stories that shape markets? Explore Community Narratives
Result: Fair Value of $711 (OVERVALUED)
Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what's behind the forecasts.
However, that Curtiss Wright narrative can be knocked off course if large defense or nuclear contracts are delayed, or if nuclear buildout policies reverse or stall.
Find out about the key risks to this Curtiss-Wright narrative.
The first narrative leans on a detailed fair value estimate of about $711, yet Curtiss-Wright currently trades around $737.39 and on a P/E of 53.3x. That is higher than the US Aerospace & Defense average of 38.8x and above a fair ratio of 29.7x, which suggests meaningful valuation risk if sentiment cools.
For investors weighing that premium against growth expectations and contract visibility, it is worth stress testing what kind of earnings path would justify today’s multiple and how comfortable you are if the market moves closer to that fair ratio over time.
See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.
If the mixed signals on Curtiss-Wright have you unsure, use the numbers to pressure test your own thesis and move quickly while sentiment is clear by reviewing the 2 key rewards
You do not need to stop with Curtiss-Wright; broaden your watchlist now with focused screeners that surface fresh stock ideas you might otherwise miss.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com