Sign up
Log in
Caleres (CAL) Q4 EPS Loss Deepens And Tests Bullish Turnaround Narratives
Share
Listen to the news

Caleres (CAL) closed out FY 2026 with fourth quarter revenue of US$695.1 million and a basic EPS loss of US$0.68, while trailing twelve month revenue sat at about US$2.8 billion with a TTM basic EPS loss of US$0.21. Over recent quarters, the company has seen quarterly revenue move between US$614.2 million and US$790.1 million, with basic EPS ranging from a profit of US$0.21 in Q1 2026 to a loss of US$0.68 in Q4. This sets up a story where top line scale is in place but margin pressure is still in focus for investors.

See our full analysis for Caleres.

With the latest earnings numbers on the table, the next step is to see how this mix of revenue scale and thin margins lines up with the prevailing narratives investors follow around Caleres and its long term potential.

See what the community is saying about Caleres

NYSE:CAL Earnings & Revenue History as at Mar 2026
NYSE:CAL Earnings & Revenue History as at Mar 2026

Losses Narrow Over Five Years, But FY 2026 TTM Still in the Red

  • On a trailing twelve month basis, Caleres reported about US$2.8b in revenue and a net loss of US$6.7 million, with TTM basic EPS at a loss of US$0.21.
  • What bullish investors highlight is a 23.1% average annual reduction in losses over the past five years, yet the latest TTM loss and the Q4 FY 2026 net loss of US$22.1 million show that consistent profitability has not been reached.
    • Bulls point to the longer term loss reduction trend as evidence the business model is improving. The recent TTM loss, however, is a reminder that the turnaround is still incomplete.
    • The mix of US$2.8b in TTM revenue and a relatively small net loss can be read as operating progress, but it does not remove the basic risk that the company is still unprofitable.
Analysts who lean optimistic argue this earnings path could still support a stronger case for the business over time. They set out that view in more detail in the 🐂 Caleres Bull Case.

Interest and Dividend Coverage Stay Under Pressure

  • The risk summary flags that earnings did not adequately cover interest payments over the last 12 months and that the 2.65% dividend yield was not well covered by earnings.
  • Bears focus on this weak coverage profile as a key concern, and the recent TTM net loss of US$6.7 million supports the idea that servicing debt and paying dividends currently leans on cash flows and balance sheet flexibility rather than earnings strength.
    • Cautious investors see the combination of an uncovered dividend and interest expense as a sign that any further earnings pressure could make capital allocation choices more difficult.
    • Even with only a modest TTM loss, the fact that both interest and dividends are not covered by earnings aligns closely with the bearish narrative around financing and sustainability risk.
Skeptics who focus on these balance sheet and payout pressures set out a more cautious take on Caleres in the 🐻 Caleres Bear Case.

Low 0.1x P/S and DCF Fair Value Tension

  • Caleres trades on a P/S of 0.1x, compared with 0.3x for peers and 0.4x for the US Specialty Retail industry, while the provided DCF fair value of US$33.81 sits well above the current share price of US$10.55.
  • Consensus style narratives often treat this wide gap between the 0.1x P/S and the higher peer multiples, plus the DCF fair value, as a potential valuation opportunity, but the TTM loss and coverage issues give investors clear reasons to question how quickly that gap could close.
    • The roughly 2.5% annual revenue growth rate over the last year is lower than the US market benchmark of 10.5% per year, so the low P/S is paired with only modest growth rather than rapid expansion.
    • For many investors, this combination of modest growth, a small but real TTM loss, and an apparently low valuation is exactly why they cross check the numbers against both bullish and bearish narratives before making a call.

Next Steps

To see how these results tie into long-term growth, risks, and valuation, check out the full range of community narratives for Caleres on Simply Wall St. Add the company to your watchlist or portfolio so you'll be alerted when the story evolves.

With mixed signals on losses, coverage and valuation, the key question now is what it all means for you. Act while the details are fresh in mind, and stress test the story against the 2 key rewards and 2 important warning signs.

See What Else Is Out There

Caleres is still working through weak earnings coverage, uncovered dividends and a recent TTM loss, which together raise questions about resilience if conditions stay tough.

If you want companies where financial stability is front and center, now is a good time to check out the 72 resilient stocks with low risk scores and compare their profiles against Caleres.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.
What's Trending
No content on the Webull website shall be considered a recommendation or solicitation for the purchase or sale of securities, options or other investment products. All information and data on the website is for reference only and no historical data shall be considered as the basis for judging future trends.