Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key financial metrics. One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. With that in mind, we've noticed some promising trends at China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group (HKG:542) so let's look a bit deeper.
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group, this is the formula:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
0.024 = HK$47m ÷ (HK$3.4b - HK$1.3b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
Therefore, China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group has an ROCE of 2.4%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Hospitality industry average of 6.9%.
View our latest analysis for China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group
While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you want to delve into the historical earnings , check out these free graphs detailing revenue and cash flow performance of China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group.
The Trend Of ROCE
China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group has recently broken into profitability so their prior investments seem to be paying off. The company was generating losses five years ago, but now it's earning 2.4% which is a sight for sore eyes. Not only that, but the company is utilizing 67% more capital than before, but that's to be expected from a company trying to break into profitability. This can indicate that there's plenty of opportunities to invest capital internally and at ever higher rates, both common traits of a multi-bagger.
On a side note, we noticed that the improvement in ROCE appears to be partly fueled by an increase in current liabilities. Effectively this means that suppliers or short-term creditors are now funding 40% of the business, which is more than it was five years ago. Given it's pretty high ratio, we'd remind investors that having current liabilities at those levels can bring about some risks in certain businesses.
Our Take On China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group's ROCE
To the delight of most shareholders, China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group has now broken into profitability. Given the stock has declined 70% in the last five years, this could be a good investment if the valuation and other metrics are also appealing. So researching this company further and determining whether or not these trends will continue seems justified.
If you'd like to know more about China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group, we've spotted 3 warning signs, and 2 of them are significant.
While China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.