Sign up
Log in
Hua Medicine (Shanghai) Ltd.'s (HKG:2552) market cap surged HK$137m last week, individual investors who have a lot riding on the company were rewarded
Share
Listen to the news

Key Insights

  • Hua Medicine (Shanghai)'s significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 16 shareholders own 42% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

A look at the shareholders of Hua Medicine (Shanghai) Ltd. (HKG:2552) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 58% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

As a result, individual investors collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$1.3b market cap following a 12% gain in the stock.

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hua Medicine (Shanghai).

View our latest analysis for Hua Medicine (Shanghai)

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2552 Ownership Breakdown August 29th 2024

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hua Medicine (Shanghai)?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hua Medicine (Shanghai). This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hua Medicine (Shanghai)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2552 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 29th 2024

Hua Medicine (Shanghai) is not owned by hedge funds. Arch Venture Partners, L.P. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 7.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, VR Adviser, LLC and WuXi PharmaTech Healthcare Fund I General Partner L.P. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Li Chen is the owner of 4.0% of the company's shares.

Our studies suggest that the top 16 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

Insider Ownership Of Hua Medicine (Shanghai)

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Hua Medicine (Shanghai) Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just HK$1.3b, and insiders have HK$62m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 58% stake in Hua Medicine (Shanghai), suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 31% stake in Hua Medicine (Shanghai). This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.
What's Trending
No content on the Webull website shall be considered a recommendation or solicitation for the purchase or sale of securities, options or other investment products. All information and data on the website is for reference only and no historical data shall be considered as the basis for judging future trends.